Like anyone who has more than a passing interest in the paranormal and UFOlogy in general, I have been positively influenced by some researchers and disgusted by others. When I look at my interest in this field, 3 people come to mind that have either echoed my own thoughts or, more importantly, lead me to thinking in a new way about this mysterious topic. As you can see, all 3 of these people, while different in their approaches, have the commonality of thinking that the UFO mystery is way more than grey, bug eyed scientists from Zeta Reticuli
Jacques Vallee

This is probably an obvious choice and Jacques has probably influenced more people in this field than anyone else in our short history of UFOlogy. What I primarily admire about Jacques is his non-UFO background. This is not someone who randomly had a UFO experience and decided to look further in the field. This is a truly intelligent man who received a Ph.D. in computer science from Northwestern, has worked fro NASA in developing the first detailed map of Mars, developed some of the key tools that are allowing me to use the internet right now and is a successful multi-millionaire due to his venture capitalism. I have read only one book of his, Revelations, but have listened to countless interviews that he has done. What I really liked about Revelations is how it describes the government's peculiar interest in the topic. Instead of thinking about the government as a monolithic entity that may be hiding the secret behind extraterrestrial contact in order to subjugate it's own people, Dr. Vallee describes whacky contactee's in positions of great power in the armed forces. He also had a very interesting contact with UFOlogy's favorite whistle blower, Robert Lazar where Lazar confided to him that he doesn't completely remember his experience working at Area 51 because quote, "They were taking a lot of blood from me at the time." Also curious, and someone without a science or tech background would not have found this salient, Lazar claimed that he was hired to back engineer these completely hi tech, interstellar, extraterrestrial craft and was provided with nothing more than a bench-top volt meter in order to complete this task. It sounds like the trillions of dollars that are supposedly funding the black budget were not being funneled into scientific equipment! This really paints a picture of a government that is hiding something from the public, namely that it knows as much or even less about UFOs than civilian researchers, and is trying desperately to convince top minds in the field that it does have access to this technology. If you think about, almost all of these so called whistle blowers have something in their background that points to a history of deception, as if even if they were telling the truth, their is enough plausible deniability to ensure that they would never be taken seriously.
I also admire Vallee's sense of history when talking about the subject. It seems that a lot of demonic or angelic "visitations" in the past have a striking similarity to modern UFO encounters. It seems that whatever the phenomenon is, it is being surreptitiously taken seriously by powerful people in society, has been with us since the dawn of civilization and is very keen to cover up it's true motives and sources. It almost seems like a cosmic counter intelligence operation and it takes a mind like Vallee's to not only notice this fact but also scratch the surface on what it really is.
Greg Bishop

Greg Bishop, in my opinion, has the most original outlook on UFOlogy that I know of. His take and his research interests are varied. He can dive right in to nuts and bolts accounts of Air Force Office of Special Investigation (AFOSI) programs of deception backed by mountains of documentary evidence one day and then speculate that contactees may be part of some cosmic art project the next. The biggest impact that Greg had on me is his thought that the way UFOs influence our culture is just as or in some cases even more interesting than UFOs themselves. His excellent book, Project Beta, details AFOSI's attempt to draw away the highly intelligent, though also highly eccentric, electrical engineer and successful entrepreneur Paul Benewitz's investigation of "alien activity" at Albuquerque's Kirtland's Air Force Base. What I loved about the book is how it delved into the government covert world. One would think that Vienna or Prague would be the place to be in the late 70's/early 80's espionage world, but Bishop illustrates that the relatively small city of ABQ was, if not a front line, than at least a hotbed of interaction between government alphabet soup agencies and Soviet counter intelligence who both interfaced through the weird world of civilian UFO research organizations. I don't care where you lie on the "government isn't telling us all it knows about UFO's" spectrum, the AFOSI operation concerning Benewitz is damn interesting. More importantly, it is the genesis story of the popularity of people like John Lear, Bill Cooper, (to a lesser extent) Bill English and Phil Schneider. Even if you bought the stories of the aforementioned people, their connections to the intelligence world should make you raise more than a few eyebrows.
My first exposure to Bishop was in the excellent documentary movie, Mirage Men. The movie made me rethink highly conspiratorial UFO stories of underground firefights between ET's and special forces, bad sci fi stories of Dan Burisch and his almost word for word rip off of the goodbye scene between Elliot and ET in his account of how he alone saved an innocent ET from the evil clutches of MJ-12. Yeah, these stories do make their tellers seem like real world movie heroes, so on one hand you can see why they are told, but on the other hand, they make the government seem almost omnipotent which is no bad deal for the government. Hell, if they can make one report of a highly top secret drone seem like an ET sanctioned test of an interstellar craft, than the subterfuge is worth it. I will end with a paraphrased quote from John Keel that I first heard from Greg, "Civilian UFO organizations aren't telling the government the truth about UFO's."
Michael Swords
Although Michael Swords might be the most mainstream of the 3 influences I have mentioned here, I think that he is the influence I identify with most. He is a Ph.D. Biochemist and a devout Catholic. I have a degree in Biochemistry and I am Catholic (I am a horrible Catholic so I will have to forward anyone's spiritual advice questions to the communion of Saints!). He was a regular member of CUFOS and although I am disappointed in the success, or lack there of, that they were able to achieve with some of the brightest minds in UFOlogy, I admire their organizational structure that consisted of a lot of Ph.D. scientists. He is also heavily featured in what I think is the best UFO documentary on YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDb1oyVKnP4&list=PLujDIk_ZJDxvMKb-x5IBu8IqXfeuH-szU
And although he stopped posting on it last year, his blog, The Big Study,
http://thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com/?_sm_au_=iVVFLrQ6kvN4pJTH
is the main place to go to read up on the more obscure UFO cases, especially since Albert Rosales' Journal of Humanoid Studies site took down its yearly reports due to them now being published for purchase (no offense to Albert, I think he put a lot of time and effort into collecting those reports and deserves to profit off of them).
I think that if we had 50 Michael Swords, 50 Greg Bishops and 50 Jacques Vallees (especially Jacques, because he is a self made millionaire able to devote substantial resources to study the topic), we would have solved the UFO enigma long ago.
Think about who your favorite researchers are and consider reaching out to them because I assure you they love to hear the support amongst all of the ridicule they face in the mainstream. I am still star struck by the time that Greg Bishop personally responded to me on Facebook Messenger. Until then, I will keep looking for high strangeness in low places!